Introducing Teach it! Tuesdays
Teaching science is a hard job! It can be difficult to keep lessons fresh and find new, creative ways to hold your students' attention. Even with a passion for science and a stack of degrees and certifications, the occasional 'block' is inevitable.
Teach it! Tuesdays are meant to drive creative ideas by highlighting helpful products and offering ways to use them. Sometimes, the simplest thought will nurture a fabulous concept to include in your lesson plans, that with luck, will turn a disinterested student into an attentive participant in your class.
We hardly pretend to be experts in the teaching field, or skilled in every scientific category, but we have the desire to help the best we can. We want you and your students to be successful, and we hope that you may want to share your successes with us and our followers. Feel free to interact with our blog and Facebook posts. We can't exactly provide a village, but we can create a network!
"Question the Hypothesis" (Though it may an existing activity by another name, this version is original, without knowledge of others, using to AI to organize the process and identify related scientific concepts.) This engaging, interactive activity uses role reversal to teach the scientific method. By placing students in the role of the "skeptical scientist," they quickly learn to distinguish between testable and non-testable questions, strengthening their understanding of how to support or disprove a theory by identifying strengths or weaknesses in experimental design, variables, and data collection. Here is one plan for implementing this activity.
Preparation:
Prepare general questions written on a slip of paper and folded. These questions should be related to the steps of the scientific method designed to challenge a presenter's experiment. Place the folded questions in a large beaker or other scientific vessel.
On the Hypothesis & Variables (Testing & Logic
- "What is your independent variable (the thing you are changing)?"
- "What is your dependent variable (the thing you are measuring)?"
- "How does your 'if-then' statement clearly define the expected outcome?"
- "What are the constants (controlled variables) in your experiment, and why are they important?"
On Procedure & Methodology (Validity & Replication
- "What steps did you take to ensure your experiment is fair?"
- "How could another student replicate your experiment to get the same results?"
- "What is the sample size, and why did you choose it?"
- "What tools did you use for measurement, and how accurate are they?"
On Data & Conclusions (Evidence & Evaluation
- "How does your data directly support or contradict your hypothesis?"
- "What unexpected variables might have influenced your results?"
- "If you were to do this experiment again, what would you change to improve it?"
- "Does your conclusion go beyond your data, or is it directly supported by it?"
Procedure
- The Presentation: A student prepares a short (3-5 minute) presentation of an experiment, a hypothesis, or a scientific concept, and presents their work.
- The Question: A randomly selected student from the audience pulls a question from the "Question Beaker" and asks the presenter.
- The Defense: The presenter must answer the question, supporting their theory with evidence or acknowledging limitations.
- Reflect & Refine: After the presentation, the class discusses whether the question was a "support" question or a "disprove" question.
- Benefits of this Method
- Encourages Critical Thinking: Students move away from just stating facts and toward analyzing the validity of evidence.
- Develops Experimental Design Skills: By asking about constants and variables, students learn what makes an experiment reliable.
- Fosters Empathy and Engagement: Reversing roles makes students more comfortable with the process and encourages active participation.
- Demystifies Scientific Rigor: It helps students understand that "failure" (disproving a hypothesis) is part of the scientific process, not a failure of the student.
This activity is particularly effective for middle school science classes to teach that science is an iterative process. What do you think? Does it sound like fun? Do you think it's a positive way to promote participation? Let us know!